← Back to Articles
DividendSim logo

High Dividend Yields vs. 5-Year Capital Gains: What My DividendSim Screen Found

Published Dec 2025 • by DividendSim

If you’ve ever searched for the highest dividend yields, you’ve probably noticed the same pattern I did: the biggest yields often come with the ugliest charts.

I used DividendSim to filter for tickers that pay meaningful income and also show positive 5-year capital gains. This was a point-in-time screen (about a week ago), so treat it as a snapshot — not a guarantee.

DividendSim screener results showing high dividend yields and 5-year total return
Most of the highest yields on the screen came with substantial capital losses — a classic “yield trap” warning sign.

My starting portfolio

To keep this simple, I picked 10 holdings and allocated $1,000 to each (a $10,000 portfolio total), with reinvestment turned on where possible.

DividendSim portfolio summary showing $10,000 holdings value
Starting point: $10,000 holdings value.
DividendSim holdings list showing 10 tickers at $1,000 each
The 10-ticker set I used: $1,000 in each holding.

Simulation results (1 year, 3 years, 5 years)

DividendSim’s simulations are a way to visualize how income + price movement interact. In the real world, dividends can change, prices can break trends, and distributions can be cut. Think of this section as “what would have happened if the same patterns continued,” not a prediction.
DividendSim simulation results after 1 year
1 year: Ending balance $12,292.92 (about 20%+ growth from $10,000).
DividendSim simulation results after 3 years
3 years: Ending balance $18,622.34 (approaching 2× the starting value).
DividendSim simulation results after 5 years
5 years: Ending balance $28,446.19 (nearly 3× the initial $10,000).
DividendSim growth chart showing capital, dividends earned, and reinvested growth
Growth breakdown: capital changes + dividends earned + reinvested compounding.
DividendSim chart showing monthly income over time
Monthly income trend across the 60-month simulation window.

The 10 tickers that passed my screen (snapshot)

These are the tickers I captured from my DividendSim screen — focused on high yield plus positive 5-year capital gains. The numbers below are kept exactly as they appeared in my snapshot.

Ticker Dividend yield 5-year capital gains Price Notes
PVL13.04%119.05%$1.83Launched around $20–$21 (about 13 years ago). Now much lower, with a strong 5-year rebound.
SCM12.52%16.34%$12.46Dipped near $5.00 in 2020.
SBR10.20%136.98%$68.25Dip in 2020, but shows continued growth and has been around since the 1990s.
PRT9.30%19.44%$3.87Launched around $16 in 2018. Recently looks stronger.
BEVFF8.80%54.29%$2.70Ballooned around 2004 (~$21), dropped to ~$0.11 in 2009. Since then, a solid gainer.
GLAD8.54%17.97%$21.07Launched in the $40s, dropped in 2008. Another stumble in 2020, then steady growth.
SIRZF8.17%401.49%$10.13Big 5-year gain largely tied to the slow rebound from the 2020 crisis.
SRRTF7.71%22.36%$10.805-year gains tied to the slow rebound from the 2020 crisis; no huge historical spikes.
FRHLF7.62%173.45%$11.02High ~10 years ago (~$24), bottomed under $2 in 2020. Recently looks like a steadier gainer.
JEPI7.45%3.84%$57.64Only been around ~5 years; seems relatively consistent so far.

Quick notes (what these actually are)

One thing I like about doing a screen like this is that it forces you to look past the yield number and ask: what is the underlying cashflow engine?

Many of these payouts are variable (especially trusts/royalties), and some are heavily tied to a specific cycle (commodities, credit, consumer spend, interest rates). High yield can be real — but it usually comes with a “why.”

Energy royalties / trusts (commodity-linked)

BDCs (middle-market lending)

Real estate / consumer cashflows

Options-based income

(Not investment advice — just context so the tickers aren’t “mystery yield numbers.”)


What I took away

If you want to run your own screens and simulations (and sanity-check yield vs. total return), you can do it in a couple minutes.

Disclaimer: This article is for education and experimentation — not financial advice.